CRITICAL REVIEW OF MASLOW'S THEORY


Maslow’s Need hierarchy Theory 
Maslow examines the question why people work in terms of their need satisfaction or need deprivation.His theory postulates that human needs can be organized into a hierarchy of prepotency with the  psychological needs at the bottom and self-actualization at the top. He presents five need categories o a triangle and the needs top to bottom as follows self actualization needs,esteem needs,social needs,safety needs and psychological needs.  


Critical Review of Maslow’s Theory
There is little empirical evidence in support of this theory. Maslow himself asserts that the theory is primarily a frame work for future research. E. Lawler and J .Suttle collected data on 187 managers in two different organizations over a period of 06 months to one year.They found little evidence to support Maslow’s theory that human needs from a hierarchy. D. T.,Hall and K. Nougaim did not find a strong evidence of hierarchy in their studies involving a group of managers over a period of 05 years. There was obviously an upward movement of need prominence as a result of upward career change and not from the satisfaction of lower order needs.
Another criticism against Maslow’s theory is that this model of motivation does not handle the problem of linkage between individual need satisfaction and the achievement of organizational objectives. For an example the objective of an organization is “increasing productivity” to achieve the above workers are asked to produce high quality products in order to cut down the final rejection rate.In this case the workers might be deriving more need satisfaction from making higher quality product t the cost of quality. Yet another criticism against Maslow’s theory is non accountability of individual differences in motivation.Maslow himself explained that his model may not hold good for persons with particular experiences.His theory thus becomes non-predictive because data that does not support it can be interpreted in terms of individual differences.


Conclusion
Despite these criticisms this theory has some implications for management practices. It implies that in-order to get the maximum from the worker,the organization,has to attempt to satisfy higher order needs  and that the organization’s concern for the satisfaction of lower order needs  need not be overly stretched because a fully satisfied need does not fully motivate .

Reference/Bibliography
Armstrong, M and Taylor, S (2014) A Hand Book of Human resource Management Practice, Kogan Page, 13th ed., UK
Prateek Dave, ( 2012Abraham Maslow’s Need hierarchy theory and its criticism; Mar 30th , , available athttp://studypsychologyonline.blogspot.com/2013/05/criticisms-of-hierarchy-of-needs-theory.html  (accessed on 27th  November 2017 at 1.35 pm)
Picture adopted by http://www.hrinasia.com/ (accessed on 27nd Nov at 2.55p m)


Comments

  1. All together i find this article good but much can be added. Similar to the criticism there are some positive s to this theory. Some people still find this theory work well for them. There was an extension to this theory after few years. But I'm very impressed with the work you have done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Prof Baskar has already addressed your issue in his conclusion "Despite these criticisms this theory has some implications for management practices"

      Delete
  2. excellent views well done, also touched on the fact that its even popular today good reference keep the pressure up.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent findings and writings.The debate has been submitted for the present.good work keep it up

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Psychological contract and HRM in modern industry

TALENT MANAGEMENT

SIGNIFICANCE OF CULTURE IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL HRM